There is a version of this article written by every web agency on the internet, and it always concludes that you should hire a web agency. This one does not, because for a decent number of small businesses a website builder is the correct decision and pretending otherwise is how you end up selling someone a £1,500 site they did not need.
Builders are genuinely good now
It is worth saying plainly. Wix, Squarespace and their equivalents have improved enormously. The templates are well designed, the output is broadly mobile-friendly, hosting and SSL are handled, and you can have something respectable online in an afternoon without knowing anything technical.
Ten years ago a builder site was easy to spot. Today most people cannot tell, and more importantly, most of your customers do not look for the difference. Any comparison that opens by claiming builder sites look cheap is out of date.
When a builder is the right answer
You are testing whether the business works. If you do not yet know what you are selling or to whom, spending on a custom site is spending on a set of assumptions. Get something up, find out what people actually ask you, then build.
The site is a business card. Who you are, what you do, how to reach you. If nothing on the site has to happen — no ordering, no booking, no quoting — a builder does this competently and a developer would be charging you for the same result.
Your budget genuinely is a few hundred pounds. Then it is not a choice between a builder and a developer, it is a choice between a builder and nothing. Take the builder. A working site you can afford beats a perfect one you cannot.
You enjoy tinkering with it. Some business owners genuinely like editing their own site and are good at it. That is a real advantage and it makes the builder route work better for you than it does for most people.
Where the ceiling is
The limits are real, and they arrive in a predictable order.
Speed on mobile data. Builders carry a lot of shared machinery to make the drag-and-drop editing work, and that machinery ships to your visitor's phone. For a business where people search on the move — food, taxis, barbers, anything urgent — that is the difference between a page that loads before the decision is made and one that does not.
Local structure at any depth. You can make one good page about your town. Making a proper page for each of eight areas you serve, each with correct local business markup and content that is genuinely different, is where builders get laborious and where the templates start fighting you.
Anything that has to happen your way. Ordering with your collection windows. Booking with your cancellation rules. A quote form that prices on the dimensions you need. Builders offer a version of each of these; what they do not offer is your version, and the gap between the two is usually the reason people call us.
Owning it. Your site lives on their platform under their terms. That is a perfectly reasonable trade for what you get, but it is a trade, and it is worth making it knowingly rather than discovering it later.
What hiring someone actually buys
Not "a better-looking website". Templates are designed by good designers. What you are actually buying is three things.
Someone deciding what to leave out. The main value in a small business site is a ruthless view of what the page is for. That is judgement, not code, and it is the part a template cannot supply because it does not know what your business does.
Behaviour specific to your business. The ordering flow, the booking rules, the enquiry form that asks for what you actually need to quote. This is where the money goes and where it earns back.
Structure that search engines can use. A page per service and a page per area you genuinely serve, with valid markup, built to be found rather than retrofitted afterwards.
Comparing the cost honestly
A builder has a low monthly cost and your own time. The time is the part people forget: a weekend of your evenings has a real value, and for many owners it is the most expensive part of the whole exercise.
A built site has an upfront cost and much lower ongoing cost. Ours are published — £1,000 up to five pages, £1,500 up to ten — specifically so this comparison can be made with actual numbers on both sides.
Over a few years the two totals are closer than they look at the start. Which means the decision should turn on what the site needs to do, not on the price tag in month one.
If you outgrow it
Starting on a builder does not trap you, but it does cost something to leave. Content usually transfers with some manual work; design does not transfer at all; and the important part is keeping your URLs and redirects intact so you do not lose whatever search visibility you built up.
That is a normal, scoped piece of work rather than a disaster. It is worth knowing about in advance, though, because "we will move it later" is easier to say than to budget for.
The short version
If your site needs to say something, use a builder and spend the saved money on something that grows the business. If your site needs to do something — take the order, take the booking, be found in eight towns rather than one — that is the point where a builder starts costing you more than it saves.
Not sure which side of the line you are on?
Send us what you have and what you need it to do. If the honest answer is that a builder covers it, that is the answer you will get, and it costs nothing to hear.
Get an honest answer